Serving Tables: More Than Meets the Eye in the Early Church

Acts, a substantial book in the Bible, offers a wealth of detail about the early church. While sermons can touch upon key aspects, blog posts allow for a deeper exploration of nuances often missed. Let’s delve into a fascinating passage, Acts 6:1-7, which introduces the concept of “Serving Tables” and its profound implications.

Unpacking Acts 6: Serving Tables and Serving the Word

A curious detail emerges in Acts 6:1-7. It describes the selection of individuals to “serve tables” so that the apostles could dedicate themselves to “serving the Word.” However, what’s striking is that these very individuals, tasked with table service, become prominent figures in proclaiming the gospel in the subsequent chapters. Stephen, for instance, delivers the longest and arguably most pivotal sermon in Acts, and Philip is instrumental in spreading the gospel beyond the Jewish community for the first time.

This might seem paradoxical. One might assume “serving tables” is a secondary role, less significant than “serving the Word.” Yet, the narrative suggests otherwise. Perhaps it’s true that those who serve in practical ways often have a powerful voice. But this episode prompts a deeper question: Why did Luke, the writer of both the Gospel of Luke and Acts, present this historical account in this seemingly inverted way?

The Root of the Issue: Neglect and Division

Acts 6 reveals an internal challenge that required careful attention and decisive action within the burgeoning Christian community. Interestingly, as the number of believers grew, so did the complexities they faced.

“Now in these days when the disciples were increasing in number, a complaint by the Hellenists arose against the Hebrews because their widows were being neglected in the daily distribution.” Acts 6:1 (ESV)

While the first internal conflict in the church revolved around financial integrity (Acts 4:32-5:11), this second issue centered on the tension between “Hellenists” and “Hebrews.” These were two groups within the Israelite community with a key distinction: language. Hellenists primarily spoke Greek, while Hebrews spoke Aramaic or Hebrew.

In the early church, we see the emergence of division along cultural and linguistic lines. It’s not difficult to imagine the dynamics at play. Those more aligned with the Jerusalem majority, the Hebrews, likely had greater access and inclusion. Conversely, the Hellenists, perceived as less traditionally Israelite, faced marginalization. Before the larger ethnic tensions between Jewish and Gentile Christians arose, the neglect of Hellenistic widows was a clear sign of internal segregation.

These Hellenistic widows were among the most vulnerable in Jerusalem society. Widows in the ancient world lacked social power and influence. They were often seen as dependents rather than contributors. Their Greek language further marked them as different from the dominant culture. These women were perpetually on the fringes, looking in.

The Significance of “The Table”

But what were these widows missing out on? What does Luke imply by “daily distribution” (v.1) and the proposed solution of selecting seven men to “serve tables” (v.2)?

Initially, it might seem like an early form of welfare or charitable food distribution. While it certainly involved caring for the needy, its meaning is likely richer than a simple handout program.

The word “distribution” in verse one is the same word used for “serve tables” in verse two, and again for “ministry [service] of the Word” in verse four. The consistent use of “service” in connection with “tables” points to a deeper understanding of the table in this context. It signifies daily, ongoing service centered around a communal table.

This passage echoes earlier descriptions of the Christian community in Acts:

“And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts…” Acts 2:46 (ESV)

Rather than a food bank analogy, Luke is likely referring to the inclusion of marginalized individuals in the daily shared meals, taking place in homes. Being “served” at the table was about being included in the community’s fellowship. The issue wasn’t simply about general poverty relief, but specifically why Greek-speaking widows were being excluded from the “table fellowship” of the Christian community.

Table fellowship is a recurring and significant theme in Jesus’ ministry throughout the Gospel of Luke. It’s a powerful way in which the marginalized are brought into the family of God. Jesus repeatedly shares meals with the outcast (Luke 5:27-32), invites the unexpected to the great banquet (Luke 14:15-24), and builds an inclusive community through the symbolic act of sharing meals (Luke 9:10-17; 22:1-38).

Sharing a meal fosters a unique environment of care, connection, and conversation. Around a table, people are seen, known, and valued. Then and now, the table is a transformative space for personal and communal growth.

“Luke shows that the act of waiting on tables is precisely the means through which the Word of God can be proclaimed among other marginalized communities.”

The table is a central place where the unity of the church is expressed and the gospel is actively proclaimed. Therefore, the exclusion of any group from this fellowship is a serious issue that needed immediate resolution. Denying someone a seat at the table contradicts the very essence of Jesus’ ministry and his inclusive vision for community.

“The table is one of those places where the unity of the church is expressed and the gospel is proclaimed.”

The Ministry of Serving: From Table to Word

Seven men, bearing Greek names, are chosen to serve tables – indicating they were likely Hellenists themselves. Those who voiced the complaint were empowered to enact the solution, addressing a systemic issue with a structural change.

This resolution created the conditions for the message of God to extend beyond the Hebrew-centric community of Jerusalem. Their initial role as “table servers” became the platform for them to become “servers of the Word.”

“The dichotomy between the ministry of the Word and the ministry of the table cannot be found in the accounts of Jesus, nor can it be found in the ministry of the Seven.”

They continued Jesus’ ministry to the marginalized and oppressed. They continued to build the family of God by extending invitation and inclusion.

Those who serve often speak powerfully, not just through words, but through their actions. Stephen and Philip exemplify this. Stephen boldly proclaimed that God’s presence is not confined to a single location, and Philip carried the gospel to the first Gentile convert.

Their courageous proclamation marks a significant turning point in Acts. As the gospel spreads from Jerusalem, Judea, and Samaria, to the ends of the earth, the Holy Spirit works through those who serve both at tables and with the Word. May we also grow in our ability to serve in both these vital capacities.

References