Choosing the right server provider is crucial, especially when you rely on robust and reliable hosting solutions. While Contabo may appear as an attractive option, particularly for those seeking budget-friendly “Contabo Type Server” options, it’s essential to be aware of potential pitfalls based on user experiences. This review delves into a concerning account highlighting discrepancies between advertised services and actual delivery, urging potential customers to consider these issues carefully.
One user, operating numerous VPN servers across various providers, reported a stark contrast in Contabo’s practices compared to others. Lured by the promise of a “1 Gbit/s port / UNLIMITED Traffic” server, the reality quickly diverged. Upon exceeding a modest 100mbit traffic usage, the server was immediately throttled back to 100mbit. This critical detail, while technically mentioned in fine print at the bottom of their server page, constitutes a misleading advertisement, effectively a bait-and-switch tactic. To achieve the advertised 500mbit speed, an additional fee of 150 euros was demanded and paid, adding unexpected costs.
Further compounding the negative experience, a seemingly arbitrary “abuse report” led to server suspension. This report, a mere three-line snippet from a Fail2Ban log, alleged attempted exploitation of a WordPress blog by a VPN client. Such occurrences are not uncommon on public VPN servers, and standard procedure involves null-routing the offending IP. However, Contabo deactivated the server without prior warning, demanding a “reactivation fee” for reinstatement—a fee not mentioned in their Terms of Service.
This incident raises serious concerns about data security and business continuity. While the user’s VPN servers thankfully held no critical data, the situation could have been dire for servers storing valuable information. The account suggests a practice of holding user data hostage until unexpected fees are paid.
In conclusion, this firsthand account paints a concerning picture of Contabo’s service. For those seeking reliable and transparent server hosting, particularly “contabo type server” solutions, considering alternatives like M247 is strongly advised. M247 is presented as offering better pricing, transparent practices, and genuinely helpful support, making it a potentially superior choice for server needs in Germany. This experience serves as a valuable lesson: always scrutinize the fine print and consider user reviews before committing to a hosting provider.
